ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the use of prophylactic use of antibiotics for special diagnosis and treatment in our hos-pital,and to provide reference for rational use of antibiotics. METHODS:The patients receiving special diagnosis and treatment were collected from our hospital during Jan.-Aug. 2016. The prophylactic application of antibiotics was analyzed statistically. RE-SULTS:Among 149 included patients,there were 62 cases of prophylactic use of antibiotics with utilization rate of 41.61％. Among 62 patients receiving antibiotics,5 cases were given medicine orally and others were via injection. Nine categories 18 types of antibiotics were used,involving 69 times;cephalosporin were used in 49 times(71.01％),among which top 3 types in the list of use sequence were cefodizime,cefotetan and cefazolin;prophylactic use of antibiotics was not found in angiography(including coronary artery) and stent implantation. Utilization rate of antibiotics for other diagnosis and treatment was more than 50％. The prophylactic use of antibiotics was complex in ureteroscopy and cystoscopy,shock wave lithotripsy;the selection of drug types started from the high level. There were 59 cases of single drug(95.16％)and 3 cases of two-drug(4.84％). Total of 41 cases were given medicine 0.5-2 h before surgery or at the beginning of anaesthesia (66.13％). Medication time of 18 cases was ≤24 h (29.03％);that of 11 cases was >24-48 h(17.74％). CONCLUSIONS:The prophylactic use of antibiotics is relatively standard in angiography(including coronary artery),stent implantation and implantation of peritoneal dialysis tube in our hospital. There are some problems during special diagnosis and treatment,such as the indication of drug delivery is not strict;the selection of drug types starts from the high level;medication timing is not suitable;medication course is excessively long.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the efficacy of polyene phosphatidyl choline combined with Hugan tablets in the treatment of drug-induced liver injury. Methods:Totally 80 cases of drug-induced liver injury were randomly divided into the observation group (40 cases )and the control group(40 cases). The observation group was given polyene phosphatidyl choline injections 697. 5mg+5%glucose injections 250ml,ivd,qd,combined with Hugan tablets 1. 44g,po,tid,the control group was given polyene phosphatidyl choline injections 697. 5mg+5%glucose injections 250ml,ivd,qd,and the symptomatic treatment in the two groups was the same. The two groups were treated for 20d. Alanine aminotransferase ( ALT), aspartate aminotransferase ( AST), total bilirubin ( TBIL), glutamyl transpeptidase(GGT) and alkaline phosphatase(ALP)were detected respectively before and after the treatment, and the therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups. Results: After the treatment,the total effective rate in the observation group was 97. 5%,which was significantly higher than that in the control group(P <0. 01),Symptoms,signs and biochemical indices in the two groups were improved obviously. The decrease of ALT,AST and GGT in the observation group after the treatment was obviously lower than that in the control group(P<0. 05). Conclusion: Polyene phosphatidylcholine injections combined with Hugan tablets in the treatment of liver injury is better than polyene phosphatidyl choline, which is worthy of clinical application.